280

What was the question again? [For] some people, the house belonged to the family for more than 200 years. So those houses belonged to them as a family heirloom, as inheritance – heritage as a family property inheritance. Those memories them as children playing at home, in the street, of the grandmother, the mother or the father… Those memories gave a lot of value and they did not want to get rid of the property. But as a family heritage. It is more familiar, so it’s a better appreciation than as World Heritage. As a cultural artefact, that property does not belong to them. As a family, it does. There is a sentimental attachment to it and that is why they want to preserve it.

But on the other hand, it is a heritage of humanity. They see it as part of [the public] property. That’s why they say, “They do not let me put in a window or change the doors.” That’s forbidden when having a building of patrimonial value. There is another problem, and it’s that it’s a family affair. I mean, someone used to own that house, right? And when they passed away, it was inherited. Then the house is divided according to the number of children, [the] heirs. So the houses have been fragmented, and when they want to paint a façade or fix the roof, they have to agree, and some have cash and some have no cash. – Jimena